Border apprehensions wildly exaggerated in formula behind Senate bill, say critics
The 90 percent apprehension goal set by Senate and House bills seeking to rein in illegal immigration while establishing a path to citizenship for those crossing into the U.S. from Mexico is based on fuzzy math, according to critics.
The goal, which is supposed to give teeth to legislation some view as amnesty, would depend on a Department of Homeland Security formula for determining the success rate of catching illegal border crossers. That formula requires visual or physical evidence for determining someone got past the border patrol, evidence that simply isn’t left behind in most cases. The result, say critics, is a wildly exaggerated success rate for catching illegal border crossers.
“To calculate it, border patrol officers go out and look for physical evidence of crossings… you know, ‘I saw this person cross and I didn't get him.’ Or, ‘I saw footprints in the sand,’” John Whitley, an economist who analyzed such statistics while he served as the director of the DHS’s Program Analysis & Evaluation department under President Bush, told FoxNews.com.
The problem is that, no matter how hard border patrol officers try to find physical evidence of successful illegal crossings, they can’t find everything....
Read more at: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/06/05/border-apprehensions-wildly-exaggerated-in-formula-behind-senate-bill-sayLabels: Immigration, Politics